<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Pagerank Tsunami Hits the Last Days of 2009!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009</link>
	<description>Blog about software reviews, computer tips and tricks, technology news, web applications, and social media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathdelane</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathdelane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-937</guid>
		<description>@IrishWonder
Your thoughts are welcome. In fact, I was surprised by your statements when in reality you&#039;re selling SEO services for a company! And you&#039;re trying to get some juice out of this blog. Not a clever move after all, it&#039;s pretty obvious.

Let me tell you this so as not to shame yourself, I don&#039;t breathe pagerank but it does matter somehow. If you&#039;re talking about the toolbar, the toolbar is less accurate by a mile and is too antiquated for a gauge. Now, who&#039;s two thousand and late? You better polish your facts before engaging in a conversation. 

Clean up your act and do some research. You&#039;re not even respectful when you leave your company&#039;s URL on the namefield instead of your real name or what have you when there&#039;s a comment policy in place. I&#039;ve unlinked your URL because this blog does want to link to bad neighborhoods and SEO guru wannabies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@IrishWonder<br />
Your thoughts are welcome. In fact, I was surprised by your statements when in reality you&#8217;re selling SEO services for a company! And you&#8217;re trying to get some juice out of this blog. Not a clever move after all, it&#8217;s pretty obvious.</p>
<p>Let me tell you this so as not to shame yourself, I don&#8217;t breathe pagerank but it does matter somehow. If you&#8217;re talking about the toolbar, the toolbar is less accurate by a mile and is too antiquated for a gauge. Now, who&#8217;s two thousand and late? You better polish your facts before engaging in a conversation. </p>
<p>Clean up your act and do some research. You&#8217;re not even respectful when you leave your company&#8217;s URL on the namefield instead of your real name or what have you when there&#8217;s a comment policy in place. I&#8217;ve unlinked your URL because this blog does want to link to bad neighborhoods and SEO guru wannabies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com &#187; How rank is it?</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com &#187; How rank is it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-933</guid>
		<description>[...] This &#8220;enhancement&#8221; to PageRank may not make you like it any better:  I just came across a very unpleasing revelation to end the year however it&#8217;s just part of every blogger or webmaster&#8217;s life to be hit by Google once in a while or maybe frequently for some. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This &#8220;enhancement&#8221; to PageRank may not make you like it any better:  I just came across a very unpleasing revelation to end the year however it&#8217;s just part of every blogger or webmaster&#8217;s life to be hit by Google once in a while or maybe frequently for some. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrishWonder</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>IrishWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-928</guid>
		<description>Do you eat and breathe by your blog&#039;s pagerank so you should worry that much about it? Toolbar pagerank is just that - toolbar pagerank. Did it affect your positions? What did you really lose except for a few pixels on the toolbar? Come on, it&#039;s not 2004 any more. 

As for shared hosting and page load speed - there surely are things to be done about the onpage optimization regardless of whether you host on a shared account or a private server, so not really an issue that cannot be handled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you eat and breathe by your blog&#8217;s pagerank so you should worry that much about it? Toolbar pagerank is just that &#8211; toolbar pagerank. Did it affect your positions? What did you really lose except for a few pixels on the toolbar? Come on, it&#8217;s not 2004 any more. </p>
<p>As for shared hosting and page load speed &#8211; there surely are things to be done about the onpage optimization regardless of whether you host on a shared account or a private server, so not really an issue that cannot be handled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slow Download Speed = Lower Google Page Rank : Ft. Hard Knox</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Slow Download Speed = Lower Google Page Rank : Ft. Hard Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-915</guid>
		<description>[...] BTW, although Google is claiming that this change is part of its new &#8220;Caffeine&#8221; algorithm, which won&#8217;t be rolled out until &#8220;after the holidays,&#8221; to avoid stressing out bloggers, I think what they meant is that they aren&#8217;t going to publicize the change until then. It appears the changes are already being rolled out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BTW, although Google is claiming that this change is part of its new &#8220;Caffeine&#8221; algorithm, which won&#8217;t be rolled out until &#8220;after the holidays,&#8221; to avoid stressing out bloggers, I think what they meant is that they aren&#8217;t going to publicize the change until then. It appears the changes are already being rolled out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathdelane</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathdelane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Very true but if the quality of search results will be taken in jeopardy, I&#039;m afraid that Google&#039;s killing itself and is making its own version of 2012 for SERPs.

Thanks for dropping by Shane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true but if the quality of search results will be taken in jeopardy, I&#8217;m afraid that Google&#8217;s killing itself and is making its own version of 2012 for SERPs.</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by Shane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathdelane</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathdelane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Happy New Year John! Thank you for the boost. Now, I&#039;m thinking that Google has long been fooling around since the internet. Why should I worry anyway? Congrats on your PR increase!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year John! Thank you for the boost. Now, I&#8217;m thinking that Google has long been fooling around since the internet. Why should I worry anyway? Congrats on your PR increase!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-898</guid>
		<description>The question is: Will you see a difference in traffic because of the reduced PR?
I don&#039;t know myself. Seems to me that the PR stuff is almost non-significant these days. However, I agree that anything that affects bloggers negatively can&#039;t be a good thing (I&#039;m a blogger too, after all). I definitely welcome anything that puts a blog with good content ahead of a bunch of static pages.
.-= Shane´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://richquickreview.com/backlinks-rqr-basics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Backlinks (RQR Basics)&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is: Will you see a difference in traffic because of the reduced PR?<br />
I don&#8217;t know myself. Seems to me that the PR stuff is almost non-significant these days. However, I agree that anything that affects bloggers negatively can&#8217;t be a good thing (I&#8217;m a blogger too, after all). I definitely welcome anything that puts a blog with good content ahead of a bunch of static pages.<br />
.-= Shane´s last blog ..<a href="http://richquickreview.com/backlinks-rqr-basics/" rel="nofollow">Backlinks (RQR Basics)</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/websites/google-pagerank-tsunami-hits-the-last-days-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=2298#comment-897</guid>
		<description>I was disappointed to see people&#039;s blogs go down especially people that have been working real hard.When I first started my blog it seems like it was a PR4 out the gate, then after along time I went to 3 and just figured it was because I was transferring to much link juice which was ok with me,to me it&#039;s all just random and doesn&#039;t make much sense.I noticed when I was fixing a new blog and noticed that little green bar up to 2 I knew they came by but Google Page Rank has lost it&#039;s appeal from when I first started back then people were like drug addicts waiting :) Best wishes your blog still kicks ass no worries Happy New Year my friend
.-= John Sullivan´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://potpolitics.com/2009/12/31/do-you-still-doubt-do-follow-google-page-rank-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Do you STILL doubt do follow ? Google page rank update&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was disappointed to see people&#8217;s blogs go down especially people that have been working real hard.When I first started my blog it seems like it was a PR4 out the gate, then after along time I went to 3 and just figured it was because I was transferring to much link juice which was ok with me,to me it&#8217;s all just random and doesn&#8217;t make much sense.I noticed when I was fixing a new blog and noticed that little green bar up to 2 I knew they came by but Google Page Rank has lost it&#8217;s appeal from when I first started back then people were like drug addicts waiting <img src='http://softwarecritics.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Best wishes your blog still kicks ass no worries Happy New Year my friend<br />
.-= John Sullivan´s last blog ..<a href="http://potpolitics.com/2009/12/31/do-you-still-doubt-do-follow-google-page-rank-update/" rel="nofollow">Do you STILL doubt do follow ? Google page rank update</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

