<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOW TO: Revert Firefox to Older Version</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version</link>
	<description>Blog about software reviews, computer tips and tricks, technology news, web applications, and social media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doktorthomas</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-12301</link>
		<dc:creator>doktorthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-12301</guid>
		<description>I am tired and vexed with all the up-dates from a plethora software distributors (MSFT,Adobe,Mozilla,Java,Corel, etc). Firefox is no exception. My feeling is if it needs an update, it should not have been released in the first place. 

As for new versions (MSFT,Adobe,Sage,[not]Intuit), I do not buy them (I look for alternates). New versions rarely if ever offer anything additional worth the extra/new money--QuickBooks 2011 is an excellent example-just trashy eye candy not needed for accounting, the software&#039;s primary purpose). 

If a user buys a full version of a quality software, they ought to get the benefit of all the sub-versions (which is what what the &quot;new&quot; annual versions really are). If a software company wants to resell me, it had better be truly a new a program--not a reheated version of what I have. WordPerfect 6.1 still out performs the subsequent versions in speed with virtually no loss in features. It is not even 32 bit!!! (Granted, file naming is limited, but not performance or features.)

I have made it clear to the powers that be at Mozilla on numerous occasions that their so-called &quot;improvements&quot; are mystical at best. Soon FF will be as bloated as the other no-so-fast browsers (remember Netscape??). The latest version 4.0 is a dog. (Mozilla: Don&#039;t bother to patch it, just pull it.)

Since there are only a half-dozen worth while add-ons to FF anyway, new versions do little for avid users. I switched to Dragon, tho&#039; it too is less than fulfilling. And it (like FF) doesn&#039;t run RoboForm 6.10 (which had an excellent track record for user/purchasers until recently). They are off my list also. (Check out LastPass.)

Anyway I came here to get the low down on reverting to 3.5. That too seems misty ... unclear and click through is likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tired and vexed with all the up-dates from a plethora software distributors (MSFT,Adobe,Mozilla,Java,Corel, etc). Firefox is no exception. My feeling is if it needs an update, it should not have been released in the first place. </p>
<p>As for new versions (MSFT,Adobe,Sage,[not]Intuit), I do not buy them (I look for alternates). New versions rarely if ever offer anything additional worth the extra/new money&#8211;QuickBooks 2011 is an excellent example-just trashy eye candy not needed for accounting, the software&#8217;s primary purpose). </p>
<p>If a user buys a full version of a quality software, they ought to get the benefit of all the sub-versions (which is what what the &#8220;new&#8221; annual versions really are). If a software company wants to resell me, it had better be truly a new a program&#8211;not a reheated version of what I have. WordPerfect 6.1 still out performs the subsequent versions in speed with virtually no loss in features. It is not even 32 bit!!! (Granted, file naming is limited, but not performance or features.)</p>
<p>I have made it clear to the powers that be at Mozilla on numerous occasions that their so-called &#8220;improvements&#8221; are mystical at best. Soon FF will be as bloated as the other no-so-fast browsers (remember Netscape??). The latest version 4.0 is a dog. (Mozilla: Don&#8217;t bother to patch it, just pull it.)</p>
<p>Since there are only a half-dozen worth while add-ons to FF anyway, new versions do little for avid users. I switched to Dragon, tho&#8217; it too is less than fulfilling. And it (like FF) doesn&#8217;t run RoboForm 6.10 (which had an excellent track record for user/purchasers until recently). They are off my list also. (Check out LastPass.)</p>
<p>Anyway I came here to get the low down on reverting to 3.5. That too seems misty &#8230; unclear and click through is likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amolkulkarni82 (Amol Kulkarni)</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>amolkulkarni82 (Amol Kulkarni)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/amolkulkarni82&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;amolkulkarni82 (Amol Kulkarni)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;amolkulkarni82 (Amol Kulkarni)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/amolkulkarni82&quot;/&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Revert Firefox to Older Version: [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/amolkulkarni82" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="amolkulkarni82 (Amol Kulkarni)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="amolkulkarni82 (Amol Kulkarni)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://purl.org/net/spiurl/amolkulkarni82"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
Revert Firefox to Older Version: [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: log home floor plans</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>log home floor plans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Hi Mathdelane !!
your all post is very imperative !! but it is different all of them excellent work just keep it up.
.-= log home floor plans´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neolh.com/learn-more-about-log-home-builders.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Learn more about log home builders&lt;/a&gt; =-.

Note: Link removed as per &lt;a href=&quot;http://softwarecritics.info/comment-policy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comment Policy&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mathdelane !!<br />
your all post is very imperative !! but it is different all of them excellent work just keep it up.<br />
.-= log home floor plans´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.neolh.com/learn-more-about-log-home-builders.html" rel="nofollow">Learn more about log home builders</a> =-.</p>
<p>Note: Link removed as per <a href="http://softwarecritics.info/comment-policy/" rel="nofollow">Comment Policy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Moralde</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>James Moralde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Yes Math, please do share any thoughts on these Opera errors I&#039;m encountering. I believe it has got to do with either a misconfiguration or interfering program, because I have not set a firewall on my computer.

Looking forward to more of your tips.
.-= James Moralde´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://moralde.com/wordpress-slideshow-plugin-superb-slideshow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress Slideshow Plugin: Superb Slideshow&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Math, please do share any thoughts on these Opera errors I&#8217;m encountering. I believe it has got to do with either a misconfiguration or interfering program, because I have not set a firewall on my computer.</p>
<p>Looking forward to more of your tips.<br />
.-= James Moralde´s last blog ..<a href="http://moralde.com/wordpress-slideshow-plugin-superb-slideshow/" rel="nofollow">WordPress Slideshow Plugin: Superb Slideshow</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghabuntu</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>ghabuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Hi. I have never experienced any problem whatsoever with any new release of FF. It&#039;s always run flawlessly for me. Maybe my use of just two addons could also be a factor. But for all I know, every new version of FF works best for me.

Note: Links removed as per &lt;a href=&quot;http://softwarecritics.info/comment-policy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comment Policy&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I have never experienced any problem whatsoever with any new release of FF. It&#8217;s always run flawlessly for me. Maybe my use of just two addons could also be a factor. But for all I know, every new version of FF works best for me.</p>
<p>Note: Links removed as per <a href="http://softwarecritics.info/comment-policy/" rel="nofollow">Comment Policy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathdelane</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathdelane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Hi James,

I&#039;m glad that I was able to help you retain your Firefox installation. You wouldn&#039;t mind sharing them this post don&#039;t you? ;) Hey, I was planning to install Opera so hopefully I can shed some light on your issue with it. Most of the time it could be caused by a Firewall issue, misconfigurations in the computer or some programs that are interfering with Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that I was able to help you retain your Firefox installation. You wouldn&#8217;t mind sharing them this post don&#8217;t you? <img src='http://softwarecritics.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Hey, I was planning to install Opera so hopefully I can shed some light on your issue with it. Most of the time it could be caused by a Firewall issue, misconfigurations in the computer or some programs that are interfering with Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Moralde</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>James Moralde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Hi Mathdelane, this post proves to be really in good timing. All of my friends here at the office have been complaining about slow loading and certain buggy functioning in accessing our yahoo mails with firefox. A lot of them have moved to opera and safari. As for me, I think I shall remain stucked with firefox since my recent installations of opera and safari did not work. Both output &quot;not connected to internet&quot; or something to that effect.

Thanks to this post, I won&#039;t have the slowest browser in our office.
.-= James Moralde´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://moralde.com/my-western-digital-external-usb-hard-drive/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Western Digital External USB Hard Drive&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mathdelane, this post proves to be really in good timing. All of my friends here at the office have been complaining about slow loading and certain buggy functioning in accessing our yahoo mails with firefox. A lot of them have moved to opera and safari. As for me, I think I shall remain stucked with firefox since my recent installations of opera and safari did not work. Both output &#8220;not connected to internet&#8221; or something to that effect.</p>
<p>Thanks to this post, I won&#8217;t have the slowest browser in our office.<br />
.-= James Moralde´s last blog ..<a href="http://moralde.com/my-western-digital-external-usb-hard-drive/" rel="nofollow">My Western Digital External USB Hard Drive</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techblizz</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Techblizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-404</guid>
		<description>thanks for this information it really helps me a lot
.-= Techblizz´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://techblizz.com/2009/google-social-search-go-live-as-a-google-labs-project-on-monday/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google social search go live as a Google Labs project on Monday&lt;/a&gt; =-.

Note: Links removed as per &lt;a href=&quot;http://softwarecritics.info/comment-policy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comment Policy&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this information it really helps me a lot<br />
.-= Techblizz´s last blog ..<a href="http://techblizz.com/2009/google-social-search-go-live-as-a-google-labs-project-on-monday/" rel="nofollow">Google social search go live as a Google Labs project on Monday</a> =-.</p>
<p>Note: Links removed as per <a href="http://softwarecritics.info/comment-policy/" rel="nofollow">Comment Policy</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathdelane</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathdelane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Hey Mihai,

How are you doing? Thanks for leaving a comment here on my blog. I&#039;ll try my best to write something for NiceBlogger hopefully when I get the time.

&lt;em&gt;To all my readers:&lt;/em&gt; You might be asking why I approved Mihai&#039;s rather short comment. Well guys, he&#039;s the new owner of NiceBlogger.com and I&#039;m one of his newest author. So, it&#039;s automatic for me to accept his comments however short it may be. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mihai,</p>
<p>How are you doing? Thanks for leaving a comment here on my blog. I&#8217;ll try my best to write something for NiceBlogger hopefully when I get the time.</p>
<p><em>To all my readers:</em> You might be asking why I approved Mihai&#8217;s rather short comment. Well guys, he&#8217;s the new owner of NiceBlogger.com and I&#8217;m one of his newest author. So, it&#8217;s automatic for me to accept his comments however short it may be. <img src='http://softwarecritics.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihai Tzanc</title>
		<link>http://softwarecritics.info/tips-and-tricks/how-to-revert-firefox-to-older-version/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai Tzanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwarecritics.info/?p=1597#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Nice post ...it&#039;s realy interesting!
.-= Nice Blogger´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tzancblog.info/5-sfaturi-perfecte-despre-cum-sa-devi-faimos-in-social-media/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;5 sfaturi perfecte despre cum sa devi “faimos” in Social Media&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post &#8230;it&#8217;s realy interesting!<br />
.-= Nice Blogger´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.tzancblog.info/5-sfaturi-perfecte-despre-cum-sa-devi-faimos-in-social-media/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed" rel="nofollow">5 sfaturi perfecte despre cum sa devi “faimos” in Social Media</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

